<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terminal Server/Citrix Logon and Logoff process details</title>
	<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/10/12/terminal-servercitrix-logon-and-logoff-process-details/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Blog of Jason Conger. Here, we will focus on Server Based Computing environments including Microsoft Windows Terminal Services and Citrix Presentation Server, Application and Server virtualization, Application streaming and delivery technologies such as Microsoft Softricity, and many other server-centric topics. Also, I will point out tools and tips to help you with your Terminal Services environments.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  5 Jul 2009 03:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/10/12/terminal-servercitrix-logon-and-logoff-process-details/#comment-7</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/10/12/terminal-servercitrix-logon-and-logoff-process-details/#comment-7</guid>
					<description>When Microsoft is giving this new feature we can think of this as we no need to depend on citrix license when we are having WTS lesensing. Well any way its good start the MS for the poit of view on the Terminal service as they did not do much in the past. As we know that microsoft will give very good support as compared with Citrix where they failed  Citrix support in my point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Microsoft is giving this new feature we can think of this as we no need to depend on citrix license when we are having WTS lesensing. Well any way its good start the MS for the poit of view on the Terminal service as they did not do much in the past. As we know that microsoft will give very good support as compared with Citrix where they failed  Citrix support in my point of view.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
