<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citrix + Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) = Project Trinity</title>
	<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/12/05/citrix-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi-project-trinity/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Blog of Jason Conger. Here, we will focus on Server Based Computing environments including Microsoft Windows Terminal Services and Citrix Presentation Server, Application and Server virtualization, Application streaming and delivery technologies such as Microsoft Softricity, and many other server-centric topics. Also, I will point out tools and tips to help you with your Terminal Services environments.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 05:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/12/05/citrix-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi-project-trinity/#comment-3072</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/12/05/citrix-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi-project-trinity/#comment-3072</guid>
					<description>Citrix has a huge future doing exactly what they are doing. And really whats bad about Citrix offering its customers a solution. All of there latest aquistions are being intergrated together, no other vendor is doing this. Not to mention I use most of the aforemented technology and most of it is good. But the latest Citrix releases are years ahead of those vendors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citrix has a huge future doing exactly what they are doing. And really whats bad about Citrix offering its customers a solution. All of there latest aquistions are being intergrated together, no other vendor is doing this. Not to mention I use most of the aforemented technology and most of it is good. But the latest Citrix releases are years ahead of those vendors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Depster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/12/05/citrix-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi-project-trinity/#comment-688</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/conger/2006/12/05/citrix-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi-project-trinity/#comment-688</guid>
					<description>Well Citrix better be getting used to being a &quot;me too&quot; company.
Provision Networks is already delivering &quot;trinity&quot; today: http://www.provisionnetworks.com/solutions/vas/vas.aspx

Not to mention that every other technology they've purchased in the last 2 years faces stiff competition from much bigger or better rivals such as F5, Juniper, Cisco, Riverbed, Expand AND Microsoft who deliver SSL VPN, Acceleration, Load Balancers etc...

Unless Citrix begins to innovate again, she will not have a bright future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Citrix better be getting used to being a &#8220;me too&#8221; company.<br />
Provision Networks is already delivering &#8220;trinity&#8221; today: <a href='http://www.provisionnetworks.com/solutions/vas/vas.aspx' rel='nofollow'>http://www.provisionnetworks.com/solutions/vas/vas.aspx</a></p>
<p>Not to mention that every other technology they&#8217;ve purchased in the last 2 years faces stiff competition from much bigger or better rivals such as F5, Juniper, Cisco, Riverbed, Expand AND Microsoft who deliver SSL VPN, Acceleration, Load Balancers etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Unless Citrix begins to innovate again, she will not have a bright future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
