<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cláudio Rodrigues Blog</title>
	<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues</link>
	<description>This is a blog about server based computing and related products and technologies like Terminal Services, Citrix and others. Emerging markets such as virtualization will be covered including various reviews of SBC tools. All aspects of SBC will be discussed to enable an administrator to run an efficient TS network. Topics include network printing, RDP and ICA updates, profile and user environment management and server hardening.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	


		<item>
		<title>Repackaging the custom RDP client as an MSI!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/28/repackaging-the-custom-rdp-client-as-an-msi/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/28/repackaging-the-custom-rdp-client-as-an-msi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/28/repackaging-the-custom-rdp-client-as-an-msi/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys,

Just want to let you know that based on the feedback I got about the two articles I wrote about customizing the RDP Client (Part 1 and Part 2), I realized it would be great for you to have a third article explaining how to create an MSI out of that so you could redeploy the client to all your users.

You are lucky! I wrote the article and it will be published here at MSTerminalServices.org sometime soon!

Cheers!. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/28/repackaging-the-custom-rdp-client-as-an-msi/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/28/repackaging-the-custom-rdp-client-as-an-msi/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Seamless Windows?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/20/better-seamless-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/20/better-seamless-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/20/better-seamless-windows/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Wilco just posted his review of the Ericom PowerTerm WebConnect software on his website. What I still do not get it is why companies are still working on improving/fixing their own seamless windows engines.

Windows Longhorn, as everyone knows, has built-in support for that and it works very well, way better than any of the third party implementations out there. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/20/better-seamless-windows/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/20/better-seamless-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix finally announces its MVP-type program.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/18/citrix-finally-announces-its-mvp-type-program/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/18/citrix-finally-announces-its-mvp-type-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/18/citrix-finally-announces-its-mvp-type-program/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[After almost two years of 'we will do something'-'Oh, forget about that', Citrix finally decided it was time to improve its relationship with the SBC community out there and it is now official. The Citrix Technology Professional program is now a reality and eleven people are already nominated. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/18/citrix-finally-announces-its-mvp-type-program/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/18/citrix-finally-announces-its-mvp-type-program/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows PE available for ISVs???</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-pe-available-for-isvs/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-pe-available-for-isvs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-pe-available-for-isvs/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Oh boy, this is interesting... This is the information that is available on the Microsoft website:

"Ship Windows PE-enabled solutions in a retail setting. Previously-released versions of Windows PE have been available for license only to OEMs and corporations. Beginning with the interim versions of the Windows PE platform, Microsoft has created a new licensing option that also allows ISVs, IHVs, and ODMs to license any release of Windows PE. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-pe-available-for-isvs/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-pe-available-for-isvs/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Fundamentals is shipping!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-fundamentals-is-shipping/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-fundamentals-is-shipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-fundamentals-is-shipping/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Not sure if everyone here knows what Windows Fundamentals is. The codename Microsoft was using for it at the time was 'Eiger' and it is basically a stripped down, barebones Windows XP SP2 OS to be used on legacy PCs to turn them into thin clients. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-fundamentals-is-shipping/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/17/windows-fundamentals-is-shipping/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox extension for Citrix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/13/firefox-extension-for-citrix/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/13/firefox-extension-for-citrix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/13/firefox-extension-for-citrix/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Just saw this at Brian's website. Citrix released a beta for an extension for Firefox that allows you to basically see your published apps on a toolbar. Cool!



This would be probably very easy to do for other manufacturers like 2X, Provision Networks, etc. :-)

Come on guys! You can do it.. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/13/firefox-extension-for-citrix/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/13/firefox-extension-for-citrix/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-wall Thin Client</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/11/in-wall-thin-client/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/11/in-wall-thin-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/11/in-wall-thin-client/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[This is cool. I saw this a couple months ago and thought the idea was really impressive.

Check it out.

http://www.jack-pc.net/

As it supports Power over Ethernet, one single cable can bring you power and network connectivity.

Amazing stuff!. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/11/in-wall-thin-client/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/11/in-wall-thin-client/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PXES is back!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/10/pxes-is-back/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/10/pxes-is-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/10/pxes-is-back/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Well if you thought PXES was dead, nope, they were not.

As some may not know, 2X Software Ltd. acquired the whole PXES project from Diego. Last week they finally released PXES 3.0 (freeware of course). Although I have not tried it yet, it seems to be pretty close or similar to the 2X ThinClient Server (that I mentioned here many times it has one of the worst names ever chosen in the software industry as it is extremely confusing). And as it is free, it is worth big time a download and test. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/10/pxes-is-back/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/10/pxes-is-back/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article about the TS Gateway thing on Longhorn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/06/article-about-the-ts-gateway-thing-on-longhorn/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/06/article-about-the-ts-gateway-thing-on-longhorn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 03:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/06/article-about-the-ts-gateway-thing-on-longhorn/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[So today we posted a new article at the MSTerminalServices.org. You can read about it here. Unfortunately, as I previously mentioned here, the more I play with Longhorn and the more I read about it on articles like this, the more I think there is a nutty cracker running the show at the TS development group in Redmond? Is that you Tad? Oh boy, if Microsoft subcontracts me for six months, Longhorn TS will never be the same.. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/06/article-about-the-ts-gateway-thing-on-longhorn/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/06/article-about-the-ts-gateway-thing-on-longhorn/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Terminal Server?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/05/linux-terminal-server/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/05/linux-terminal-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.msterminalservices.org/rodrigues/2006/07/05/linux-terminal-server/</guid>
   		<description><![CDATA[Ok, another article about it.

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8822

This may be ok for a school or someone really trying to save as much money as they can. But I cannot see, at this particular moment in time, why a company would use such solution.

First of all we are still to see the 'killer' client application for Linux. <a href="http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/05/linux-terminal-server/">more...</a>]]></description>

   		<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.virtualizationadmin.com/rodrigues/2006/07/05/linux-terminal-server/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
   		</item>
	

</channel>
</rss>
